Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 17:36
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
The Odd Reason Couples Who Argue A Lot Tend To Gain Weight Faster, According To Research - YourTango
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
When will dating stop being so hard for Gen Z?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sunday Night Baseball Parlay, Picks, Predictions for Yankees vs Red Sox - Action Network
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
'28 Years Later' Marketing Hid Mother-Son Tearjerker Due to Studio Worries - Variety
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Socioeconomic background tied to distinct brain and behavioral patterns - PsyPost
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Royals share new photos of Prince William with children - BBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Smoking Rates by Country and Gender in 2025 - Visual Capitalist